You’re opting to go with the version of his perjury that justifies the charge on a presumption that you know which version is closest to the truth (and I seriously doubt any of them are the real truth).
As a jurorist I would have had an issue convicting on one of three or four contradictory stories that a witness has provided.
As I’ve stated, Alexander is not a model citizen, but he is a real POS too.
He’s not on trial. It’s not a matter of simply picking one version over the other. In the whole context it’s obvious he lied in his deposition. There are verifiable lies in it. It does not match physical and other witness evidence. So when he says he concocted that story with her, and they were actually caught at one point doing that very thing, it’s far more than just picking one over the other.
There’s a reason the jury took 12 minutes to deliberate in this case. It’s not that hard. She’s guilty. The only real issues here have to do with the mandatory sentences.
It’s a juror, not a jurorist.