Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GM Doubles Down on Volt Failure; Sells Only 58 Electric Cadillac ELRs
NLPC ^ | March 10, 2014 | Mark Modica

Posted on 03/10/2014 9:09:24 AM PDT by jazusamo

Cadillac ELR

General Motors continues to double down on plug-in electric vehicles, now offering the Cadillac ELR, which is a gussied up version of the Chevy Volt at twice the price. The latest Cadillac ELR ad has stirred up a lot of debate regarding its pro-American capitalism message as General Motors spent roughly $100,000 for each of the commercials that it ran during the Sochi Olympics.

Although the commercial garnered much attention, the heavy ad spending resulted in just 58 of the tax-subsidized (each affluent buyer gets a $7,500 federal tax credit) Cadillac ELRs being sold in February, three months into the car's launch. The debate about the ELR ad seems to be omitting the most obvious question which is, why is GM wasting shareholder's money advertising a car that has no chance of having widespread market appeal?

I'm sure GM apologists will have some explanation for the wasted marketing dollars that resulted in embarrassingly low sales. The same old sources that hyped the failed Chevy Volt (sales down over 25% in February to only 1,210 sold) can be seen speculating about the Cadillac version of the Volt competing with Tesla. The same deceptive excuses for the low initial sales figures for the Volt will likely be used for the Cadillac ELR. "Supply can't keep up with demand." "It is too early in the launch." Maybe we'll even hear of a right-wing conspiracy to hurt sales, like we did with the Volt.

There is also the philosophy that the Cadillac ELR will excite people so much that they will rush to showrooms in droves only to be sold a different Cadillac model. Sorry, but that doesn't seem to be working either. Cadillac overall sales were down 3% in February, more than the total drop of 1% for GM.

It is hard for GM to justify spending so much money advertising a vehicle that sells in such limited numbers but, like our government, GM has been supplied with an abundance of taxpayer money to do with as they please. It appears that GM's Washington masters who supplied the money want the company to continue the money-losing quest to force "green" vehicles on the public. The problem is that consumers do not want the cars.

The politically-inspired management at GM just doesn't seem to get the basic premise that building better cars at the best value will lead to more sales. Spending millions of dollars on ads in an attempt to fool consumers won't work. Consider that you do not see Tesla spending heavily on TV ads, but the car sells on its own merits (along with lots of tax subsidies). Unfortunately GM vehicles, particularly the Cadillac ELR and Chevy Volt, do not have enough merits to negate the need for heavy ad spending which still can not persuade consumers to purchase the cars.

It was obvious to many of us that a Cadillac version of the Chevy Volt, at twice the price, was not going to be a roaring success and really give Tesla a run for the money . I do not know why any auto industry pundit would say differently unless GM's ad spending is buying the favorable coverage. The attempt to put very costly lipstick on the Cadillac ELR pig will not convince motorists to buy the vehicles, nor will thousands of dollars in subsidies. The only thing that GM is doing by spending millions of marketing dollars in an attempt to deceive the public into believing that the Cadillac ELR is a viable competitor to Tesla is to further lower management's credibility.

Mark Modica is an NLPC Associate Fellow.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: cadillacelr; electricvehicles; elr; gm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Neidermeyer

My grandmother bought the Buick version of that car.
just about the best car I have ever driven in the snow but what a complete piece of JUNK.
Rust bucket lemon.
She actually had the car repainted after only a few years old and the rust came right through the new paint only a few months later.
F GM


21 posted on 03/11/2014 12:22:45 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

and the rust came right through the new paint only a few months later.
***************************
I pretty much gave up on GM back in the late 70’s when their claim to quality was summed up by their “Rusty Jones” (dealer applied) rust preventative treatments... When your bodywork sucks so bad that your ad campaigns not only hilite but FEATURE your rust preventative attempts you’re doing something WRONG.


22 posted on 03/11/2014 3:56:04 AM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
I remember good old Rusty Jones. I also remember rear quarter panels and floor boards disintegrating within 3 years. How about paint and clear coat that would just peel right off down to the primer (if the drunken uaw worker even bothered to apply primer). Great quality there GM.
23 posted on 03/11/2014 10:57:14 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

24 posted on 03/11/2014 7:35:01 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Honda Civic natural Gas
http://automobiles.honda.com/civic-natural-gas/


25 posted on 03/11/2014 7:37:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Amen, the ELR may well be the Cimarron II.


26 posted on 03/11/2014 7:49:03 PM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson