| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/06/2014 10:25:37 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Adolescent flame war behavior |
Posted on 03/06/2014 9:11:00 AM PST by butterdezillion
My neighbour for 15 years. I know his real name not his handle here - I think he doesn’t want me to see his postings. But he’s a birther if not a fan of this theory. I have no idea if he posts on this thread or not, but I have told him the diver thery is preposterous.
I almost fell off my chair when I saw the stills shot *underwater* without surface distortion from waves or refraction.
It is possible to manufacture 1/2 length, 1/8 volume approx,
Aqualungs.
http://www.bizrate.com/scuba-diving-snorkeling-equipment/miniature-air-tanks/
I still think the first youtube “diver” is fuddy struggling on the surface, but the second is totally more difficult to explain away.
The “apparatus,” or “debris-stuff” under Fuddy, is very strange.I need people with diving experience to say what that stuff is, since I am a confirmed land locked freeper :-)
If the administration were going to stage a disappearance from a simulated crash, with the pilot in on the deception as well as Yamamoto and Fuddy, but not the other passengers, then Fuddy would need to be “still on the plane when it went down in deep water” and the real live Woman evacuated a distance by diver so a Navy Helicopter can pick her up separately.
But correct me if I am wrong, wasn't there immediate initial media noise about Fuddy still being on board, and the plane sinking in deep water?? I distinctly remember it.
What we could have is a attempted fake death by “going down with the plane”, only to have the poor Lady have a heart condition activate and die in the water.
Assuming Fuddy is dead of a heart condition, then the failed “witness protection program entry” would result is a perfectly normal Catholic Funeral service with an open casket.
All demonstrated with photos in the 800 comments - sorry,no other way to show you, as not my research.
Why on earth not? Because I disagree with crackpot theories?
CORRECTION.
The man in the white shirt in the above image has to be the Pilot, not Yamamoto. Sorry.
Your neighbour is not allowed to post here anymore:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~abrit/
I sent you a private mail on this matter.
Post #204 has only one picture.
My answers to your quesetions
Image I - I see water spashing around
Image N - bubbles
Image P - what face?
Image V - underwater
Image ZD - another survivor
Image ZU - like most people, this person has two arms
Image ZZD - hard to say without context
A time index for each frame grab would place each still in context, which would be helpful.
I understand that when a thread is active and people are posting quickly that mistakes get made.
You asserted that I made a racist comment, which I did not.
Admit your mistake and it’s forgotten.
Check it out! Who knows...maybe your name will be on this list next:
http://www.nachumlist.com/deadpool.htm
Oh! And while you are going about your business here and there, we’re hacking your travels on the ehter, chump.
Your statement was a trap, purposfully made. Democrats do it all the time. Back off.
A trap? Don’t make me laugh. I answered questions.
BD can speak for themselves. So BUTT OUT.
The fingers are different. The angles of the arms are different.
So how, in the 5 minutes (or however many minutes it was) between the photo of her in the cabin and when this was taken, did she lose about 50 pounds, change into a different shirt, and find goggles and a mask? Why did she take off her life jacket? And who is in her place where her life jacket was, and why are they there instead of her?
BUTT OUT has been suggested to you as well, but for some bizaro reason you are drawn to this thread to insult other posters.
Why is that?
The photos are in exact sequence. Starting with the first frame, I posted every frame after that in sequence. The png’s are actually named according to the timestamps on my bandicam recording.
Right, there was only one image in #204 and that was the one I think is Fuddy. She’s wearing the life-vest and it’s tied across her back, she has ONE arm showing, and the clothing she’s wearing appears to have a white sleeve on which you can see a slight purple pattern. The rest of her top garment is in shadow. Your comment to that posted image was as follows:
“...so what you are saying is that one arm is horizontal, and its flesh toned, and the other is angled, and is reflecting light.”
And I replied that I could not undertand you. I still don’t. But it is possible you are mistaking the portion of her lifevest that is across her back as an arm. It isn’t.
The frames are named by the timestamp on my bandicam recording. I noted where any frames were left out. If there’s not a notation then what you see is each frame in the sequence, in chronological order.
Flesh tone arm is horizontal.
What is the white item that is at an angle, going from upper left to lower right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.