Note: Environmentalists do not want to acknowledge the relative toxicity of chemicals. The inane comment that lower toxic chemicals are more prevalent in poor communities is poppycock. They are really against any atttempt to hold the government accountable for its actions.
LOL. I have to admit, this is a new one on me. It would be laughable if it was not so pathetic. They are real POSs.
This is what happens when you "reach across the aisle" instead of standing strong on principles.
The whole AGW movement could be considered as an attempt by the lighter-skinned countries to deny the darker-skinned countries their industrial revolutions.
and don’t even getme started on the disproportioate impact of banning DDT...
Quite a claim from the enviro-nazis who have killed millions of African children by banning DDT to combat mosquito-borne malaria. Talk about uncaring racists! They hang a few nets over beds on TV and claim to have solved the terribl problem they caused.
I remember when the word “rape” was paired with every cause, such as “raping” the environment. Probably this fell into the trash can of hyping emotions when the Bill Clinton events unfolded. Now everything is said to be some sort of racism. It is tiresome. Racism is the new rape in this regard.