Time for veterans to write letters about the defense cuts focusing on national security. I think additional letters about any attempts to take already earned promises away from veterans who've already paid the price should be part of a separate letter. We went through that with the COLA cuts.
With already discharged or retired veterans it is NOT about "benefits". It's about already earned pay that has been deferred. If part of your pay is the promise of the GI Bill, medical care, whatever, and you've done your part of the bargain, then Congress shouldn't be slyly trying to renege on those promises.
1 posted on
02/26/2014 8:45:06 AM PST by
xzins
To: SkyPilot; Jet Jaguar
Time for veterans to write letters about the defense cuts focusing on national security. I think additional letters about any attempts to take already earned promises away from veterans who’ve already paid the price should be part of a separate letter. We went through that with the COLA cuts.
With already discharged or retired veterans it is NOT about “benefits”. It’s about already earned pay that has been deferred. If part of your pay is the promise of the GI Bill, medical care, whatever, and you’ve done your part of the bargain, then Congress shouldn’t be slyly trying to renege on those promises.
2 posted on
02/26/2014 8:45:46 AM PST by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: xzins
I have a breaking NEWS FLASH - the Congress AIN'T listening to "WE THE PEOPLE" and even if they did, the clown will just do whatever he wants Congress be damned - "I have a phone and a pen".
3 posted on
02/26/2014 8:50:00 AM PST by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: xzins
The military votes republican - so they will be cut to the bone.
The free sh*t army votes democrat so entitlements will grow.
4 posted on
02/26/2014 8:50:15 AM PST by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: xzins
More bombs, less soldiers.
5 posted on
02/26/2014 8:51:33 AM PST by
Theoria
(End Socialism : No more GOP and Dem candidates)
To: xzins
They are getting rid of the A-10 Warthog. Cheap, rugged, deadly, and totally dedicated to the grunts.
6 posted on
02/26/2014 8:55:07 AM PST by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate
Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can
7 posted on
02/26/2014 8:58:31 AM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: xzins
I am a vet (11A). I am happy to see war fighters cut, the sooner the better. Then the government will have to depend on the REMFs to put down any demonstrations.
To: xzins
It just dawned on me as to where “The Great ObamaNation” is going to get all the equipment for it’s private army.
15 posted on
02/26/2014 9:34:44 AM PST by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: xzins
Some reduction in defense spending, especially on the civilian side and in procurement, may well be justified. Every department and agency could use some significant reductions.
Any cuts that negatively affect the readiness of our military to meet any challenge when called upon to do so is unwise, dangerous, and a violation of the Federal government’s primary responsibility under the Constitution.
17 posted on
02/26/2014 9:47:38 AM PST by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: xzins
I agree that the defense budget needs to be cut. (Completely ignoring entitlements like SS and welfare.) There is quite a lot of waste, especially once you start getting into areas of RnD and procurement. That said, they are going about it completely wrong, and way too much cut in too little time.
To: xzins; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; Defender2; ...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson