Posted on 02/03/2014 7:20:31 AM PST by butterdezillion
Given the lack of any alternative argument on your part, I’ll happily stay with the reasonable notion that an urn inside a casket is a crazy idea and that anyone filing past such a thing would consider it very weird. Weird enough for someone to talk about it.
I agree. It is weird. But so are a lot of things about that plane “accident” that you don’t know. Unless you were involved.
So far nobody has explained how Loretta Fuddy could lay in a box 11 inches tall and have only a few little blobs stick up when a photo was taken from slightly above the casket.
And nobody has explained why KITV photoshopped an image of a body in a casket and inserted it into video footage of the viewing line at Fuddy’s funeral.
I don't see what your problem is. Take a 12" ruler and lie on the ground. How much of you sticks up over that ruler?
And nobody has explained why KITV photoshopped an image of a body in a casket and inserted it into video footage of the viewing line at Fuddy’s funeral.
Of course no one has explained it. Because KITV didn't photoshop anything! Again, your inability to resolve photography issues is your problem and your problem alone. Loretta Fuddy's body was in that casket at that funeral. Everyone there saw it. The assertion that it was an urn, when you can clearly see her tuft of hair, her breast, and her folded arms on both photo #1 and photo #4, is beyond ludicrous!
You measured the casket?
The podium where the priest spoke is on the left between the two candles, you can see the top of the podium just above the three standing men in the Hawaiian shirts. It doesn't show up
Here is another view.
The podium is now to the right partly obscured by the lid of the casket.
That podium looks like a permanent structure. The podium Abercrombie spoke at is to the left and obscured by the crowd of mourners.
Meant to add:
“It doesn’t show up in the KITV video because they zoom past it to get the casket shot.”
And edit this:
“The podium Abercrombie spoke at is on the right side of the chapel and in the first image is obscured by the crowd of mourners.”
Have you even looked at the updated PDF?
The window is missing a vertical sash, another window is missing altogether, everything lines up exactly like an image from the KHON video except for the casket, and KITV even left in part of KHON’s logo - the sparkles, which make no sense showing up where they are, on the shadowy portion of the easel frame.
As I was typing this I was wondering how the KHON logo would have been available for KITV to use on their video. So I did some checking and noticed the low number of views on these youtube videos. My son showed me how to find out when youtube videos were published, and it turns out both of these videos from the Dec 21st funeral were posted to youtube on JANUARY 21, 2014.
IOW, BOTH KHON and KITV waited a MONTH before putting these “broadcasts” on youtube. That is not standard. Right now KITV has 11 youtube videos published within the last 24 hours - video versions of the broadcasts from the past day or two.
So it is standard for these TV stations to post youtubes of their broadcasts a day or two after they air. But BOTH TV stations chose to wait a month before publishing these on the same day. What were they doing during that month? Why did they wait?
Well... KITV has the sparkly part of KHON’s logo showing in video footage that matches KHON’s images EXCEPT for the addition of a casket showing a body. And a few errors that reveal what they did...
Apparently KITV was borrowing KHON’s footage and doctoring it up during that month’s wait...
Jan 21st is 3 days after Grace Vuoto published an article commenting on peculiarities surrounding Fuddy’s death. It’s a week after I posted images on my blog showing problems with the official narrative.
Oh - and just to make sure I understand what you’re saying about photography/videography: the angle of the lens, perspective, lighting, etc all make a HUGE difference on what shows up in the photos, right? That’s what you’re saying? So it would be really weird for kitv’s camera to get exactly the same image as khon’s camera? The cameras would have to be positioned exactly the same, angle the same, lighting the same, etc. Right?
“The window is missing a vertical sash,”
No, it is not missing. It is obscured behind the State Legislature memoriam. If you place the KOHN image next to the KITV image, it is clear that they were shot at different angles and different elevations. Two cameras and two cameramen standing next to each other.
The KITV YouTube has a publishing date of December 21, 2013.
KOHN’s logo appears to be the number 2 drawn in a circle with the time above it. I don’t see any sparkly.
Check out this thread. Don't step in the... uh...
Thanks, butterdezillion.
Reverend Lynette Schaefer is who I meant. I believe she’s the woman with the bun.
Step sister Lynette Marjorie Golderman was born April 23, 1948 in San Mateo, CA.
It’s fine. At first glance, I thought it was the same church, too. Then on closer inspection, I realized the pews and layout were wrong. Sorry if I sounded short; I was in a hurry, too.
The extra width that Fuddy was packing was fat, not bone. When you lie on your back, your gut does not protrude straight in the air, defying gravity, it falls off to your sides and spreads out.
____________________-
True, but don’t ask me how I know.
From the link:
“Her priest remembered meeting her for the first time seven and-a-half years ago. “I had my defenses up, but the person that I met was humble, smart, cheerful and soulful,” said the Rev. William Kunisch, rector of St. Theresa.”
Isn’t that a strange thing to say? Why would he have his defenses up?
btw, thanks for that link. In the story, there’s a view across the church from the foot of the casket. Way over on the other side of the church is the podium from which the priest spoke. Foreshortening must have made that wooden wall on the opposite side of church (from his podium), on the altar level, seem much closer.
Thanks. I just now realized that, commented on it, and then read your comment. I should learn to read everything before I weigh in. I’m trying to find the truth, so I’ll ask this: Has anyone spotted the woman in the pink flowered dress with the white jacket in the congregation? The only place I’ve seen her is when she touches the hand of the deceased, while crying and walking past the casket.
I know (but can’t prove) that news stations edit videos, and it seems they do it as people raise questions. I have watched a video closely and then the next day, the part that struck me as odd no longer exists. I don’t know how to save videos or how to get back the original version, if that’s even possible.
I’d wondered if they are hanai sisters, stepsisters, half-sisters, or biological sisters. It’s all in the family, though, in Hawaii. Apparently. Since she had a son and a Rootsweb tree listed only one child for Marjorie’s first marriage, I wasn’t sure and didn’t spend more time looking. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
