Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeopardy's New Game-Theory Devotee Is One to Keep an Eye On
The Wire ^ | Jan. 31, 2014 | Eric Levenson

Posted on 02/02/2014 10:52:21 AM PST by 1rudeboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: CaptainK; 1rudeboy
but would be all over the board looking for the DD

I'm guessing 1rudeboy and his pals in the bar were on the lookout for those, too...

21 posted on 02/02/2014 11:59:51 AM PST by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

You wouldn’t lose that bet.


22 posted on 02/02/2014 12:01:14 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Fleming was the better host, and although the original game was a cheapskate game by comparison, the Final Jeopardy! rule was better: you got to keep the money you made. The all-or-nothing rule was just Merv’s way of screwing the second and third placers out of their winnings.


23 posted on 02/02/2014 12:03:48 PM PST by FredZarguna (Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
Out team: Ding! Who is Krups?
MC: Correct!

Krups makes coffee makers. Krupp made munitions. :)

24 posted on 02/02/2014 12:05:09 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I completely agree. It was better when you got to keep whatever money you ended up with.


25 posted on 02/02/2014 12:18:31 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

haha !!


26 posted on 02/02/2014 12:19:51 PM PST by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


27 posted on 02/02/2014 12:36:44 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Sounds like you were blessed.


28 posted on 02/02/2014 1:44:49 PM PST by bicyclerepair (TERM LIMITS TERM LIMITS TERM LIMITS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Innovators are rare and that’s why bureaucracies with their licensing, permitting and control schemes, which really amount to de facto control of your business, cause so much harm.

Innovators create massive shifts in wealth and this opportunity is followed up by early adopters who often tweak and improve the original innovation, sometimes making it much more palatable to the masses which can be slow to adopt innovations.

This is why nearly all regulation is counterproductive. Mavens, people with a near mania about a certain product/idea/thing, become go-to experts for people. Everyone knows a “car guy” or a “computer guy” who advises them. The Internet is doing this even more broadly. The free market works and I don’t know why more people don’t accept that.

Jeopardy will probably work to alter the rules if this causes a real shift in viewership, though. Jeopardy exists to sell commercial time, not reward brilliant players.


29 posted on 02/02/2014 1:46:45 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
Jeopardy will probably work to alter the rules if this causes a real shift in viewership, though.

Yah, that's the first thing I thought: Jeopardy might eliminate the Daily Double, if this technique becomes the dominant strategy.

30 posted on 02/02/2014 2:23:51 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Have you read/listened to this?

http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2014/01/nina_munk_on_po.html

It’s great and why we need to eliminate foreign aid and local welfare.


31 posted on 02/02/2014 2:42:36 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: null and void

jeopardy ping


32 posted on 02/02/2014 7:03:04 PM PST by Shimmer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks 1rudeboy.


33 posted on 02/03/2014 2:57:07 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson