Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Broadly speaking, the effect is the result of "green" and "evironmentally friendly" efforts that are meant to prevent global warming. Though he was being facetious, I happen to believe that Rush "swerved" into a plausible explanation for the California drought which he spoke about in the 3rd hour opening monologue.
1 posted on 01/22/2014 11:48:56 AM PST by mononymous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mononymous

I think it was tongue in cheek.


2 posted on 01/22/2014 11:55:35 AM PST by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mononymous

Gore et al are working the, “money-make-us” effect.


4 posted on 01/22/2014 11:58:33 AM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mononymous
The "butterfly effect", which is really chaos theory, is the main reason that I don't trust any of the long-term climate computer models. Lorenz showed that for even a simple set of non-linear equations, the solution was heavily dependent on initial conditions. By the way, Lorenz discovered the beginning of chaos theory while trying to do weather prediction.

So, even if the climate model captured all of the effects (which they don't), they would need nearly infinite accuracy of the results to predict any long term behavior.

PS: The "Mononymous1 Effect" is identical to the "butterfly effect", except at a larger scale.

5 posted on 01/22/2014 12:01:16 PM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson