It takes an ammendment to repeal an ammendment, ala Prohibition.
That was in pre-bammy days.
Yes, the headline is wrong... but ignoring the provisions of an amendment is tantamount to the same thing, and regrettably has a fairly rich history that is building up.
It says ‘effectively’ repeal.
If the Supreme Court sets precedent for others to invade privacy and violate 4th Amendment rights, who needs an official repeal?
“It takes an ammendment to repeal an ammendment, ala Prohibition.”
But it only takes an Administration and a lopsided Supreme Court to make an amendment a waste of ink.