I hope the Supremes rule broadly and correctly on this. “Probable cause” is unambiguous, and they should read the words exactly as written. The police lacked probable cause, so the evidence was obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment. Case closed. I would prefer to use such evidence in court and allow civil suits over the violation of rights, but that’s not the standard we follow.
Heck they can't even read and UNDERSTAND the 2nd, what would make Us think they can do the same with the others?