A .32 short top break revolver made of titanium. Specifically for women. This is a breakthrough design, and not because of the metal used. When a government run factory produces a revolver specificallly designed for women's defense, they have acknowledged the utility of guns for self defense. From there, the second amendment naturally follows. It may take decades, but India is clearly on the path toward recognizing the right to be armed. Almost none of Europe is at this point yet. Maybe the Czech republic.
All of gun control is based on the presumption that guns are not useful for self defense.
1 posted on
01/21/2014 6:41:55 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
What,2000 bucks for that thing??I could buy 2 HK USP or 3 Beretta 92 for that kind of money.
2 posted on
01/21/2014 6:46:00 AM PST by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: marktwain
Important step for India.
My keltec .32 weighs 7oz unloaded and holds 7 rounds.
3 posted on
01/21/2014 6:49:36 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: marktwain
To: marktwain
What? A .32? Well, I guess it is better than shooting a spitball at a target...
8 posted on
01/21/2014 7:08:07 AM PST by
Obadiah
(I Like Ted.)
To: marktwain
Under-powered and over-priced. Typical government idiocy.
9 posted on
01/21/2014 7:09:19 AM PST by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: marktwain
FReepers, don't miss the two most important words in the article: India & women. India has a BIG problem with violence against women and rape. It is NOT a place where a woman can travel alone safely. This seems to me to be targeted at (higher caste) wealthy, somewhat independent Indian women. It would be protection as well as a status symbol among friends. They will probably have no problem getting domestic orders for these.
10 posted on
01/21/2014 7:14:57 AM PST by
jdsteel
(Give me freedom, not more government.)
To: marktwain
All of gun control is based on the presumption that guns are not useful for self defense.I hate to take the cynical view, but I disagree. All gun control is based on the presumption that guns ARE useful for self defense and might be used against the main criminal enterprise in any region, the government*
*Who takes a regular shakedown of your earnings? When the mob does it it's called "a protection racket" when the government does it it's called "taxes."
11 posted on
01/21/2014 7:19:24 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: marktwain
Oh good.....a SAFETY....on a REVOLVER....!?!?!?
13 posted on
01/21/2014 7:22:53 AM PST by
G Larry
To: marktwain
If you really, absolutely have to stop someone, nothing has "halt!" like the original .455 Webley.
14 posted on
01/21/2014 7:25:17 AM PST by
PLMerite
(Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
To: marktwain
44 magnum
28.3 oz
$590
20 posted on
01/21/2014 8:18:31 AM PST by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson