Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr; ForAmerica

I think Mr. ForAmerica was coming at from the black/slave angle. You missed the mark.


81 posted on 01/18/2014 9:17:31 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: central_va; ForAmerica

Perhaps, from your perspective cva. But the “black/slave angle” is self-evident. Even the most fervent neo-cornfederates admit that “slavery was dying out” (as part of their rationalism for legitimizing the insurrection). The dismantlement of The Particular Institution was inevitable - it would not be stopped, but could be shaped. Unfortunately the slavocracy-led south wished to hold on - at any cost.

Specific to the “black/slave angle” and ForAmerica’s question - for the brief moment that Texas would be separate from the United States it would (by virtue of the desires and aspirations of its rulers) be a slave state. And then history and events would overtake them and he (and Texas) would be right where they are.


87 posted on 01/18/2014 9:44:59 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson