Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr
There is a difference between secession and rebellion. Had the south not turned to aggression, we wouldn’t have seen so much carnage. Therefore, “War of Southern Aggression”.

Yea, yea, what a load. Had the North not attacked the South, there would have been no war, period. Why? Because the South would have had everything it wanted.

Why are you having such an issue with the facts? The North attacked, finally defeated, and then occupied the South. Why? Because they felt compelled to force themselves on the South and Lord over them. That is as aggressive as you can get.

251 posted on 01/12/2014 6:25:55 PM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

Why are you having such an issue with the facts? The south provoked war with the union, attacked union possessions, and declared war against its neighbors. That is as aggressive as you can get.


256 posted on 01/12/2014 6:40:03 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson