Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: House Atreides
RE :”But try to NOT pay the taxes that will be imposed for failure to buy insurance. Good luck with that.
But nice try anyhow.”

HA, Roberts DIDN”T overturn that part of the law I posted forbidding the IRS from punishing up for not complying. He upheld it,

That part of the law was not challenged, in fact only a supporter of Obamacare would challenge that part of law and they didn't,

Nice try anyhow!

28 posted on 01/12/2014 4:41:12 PM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

Sorry, but I guess you missed the point I was trying to make. The part of the law you were pointing out said any penalties charged under the law couldn’t be “forcefully” collected. But the Roberts decision said that there ARE NO PENALTIES being charged. Taxes are charged to the non-compliant. There is nothing in the law that says that unpaid TAXES can’t be collected by lien or scarfed up from refunds of other taxes or the bank account(s) of those owing taxes. I guess we’ll have to wait until 2015 when the 2014 taxes are being settled up to see how far the IRS will go to collect “its due”.

I don’t ascribe kindness to the IRS so I don’t expect they’ll be cutting anyone any slack in this regard. From the IRS’ perspective, if the Supreme Court says it’s NOT a penalty but a tax, they will agree that it’s a tax—and they WILL go after it.

If you posted that “non-enforcement” section of the bill for some other reason, let me know.


29 posted on 01/12/2014 6:12:55 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson