Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86

Could you please provide a reference, or starting point online?


66 posted on 12/23/2013 10:42:21 AM PST by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF USA CITIZEN PARENTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: SatinDoll
Could you please provide a reference, or starting point online?

Do you mean for the fact that some states are rolling back the requirement? The second link in the article, the Seattle Times one, should discuss that.

Washington State's own administrative rules for Medicaid Estate Recovery are given here:

http://www.dshs.wa.gov/manuals/eaz/sections/EstateRecovery.shtml

A short summary:

http://www.dshs.wa.gov/pdf/ms/forms/14_454.pdf

One quirk in all this is that for regular Medicaid enrollees, as opposed to Expanded Medicaid ones, the recovery should still be applicable, from what I understand. Unless the rollback includes them also, many thousands will still be affected.

Washington State typically recovers about $17 or $18 million a year, mostly from long-term care expenses. This isn't actually a very large part of the estates that theoretically would be subject to recovery. As always, incurred costs beginning at age 55, including premiums the state pays to contractors and capitation, are eligible. At the moment I've forgotten whether long-term care expenses incurred before age 55 can be eligible in some cases.

If you or anyone have any other questions I would be happy to look up answers.

72 posted on 12/23/2013 11:58:23 AM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson