"Plaintiff's Amended Complaint was filed before the SSA responded to her FOIA request, and was rendered moot by the SSA's response to her FOIA request. If plaintiff takes issue with the adequacy of the SSA's response, she must amend her complaint to add allegations that the SSA's response was deficient. Accordingly, I will dismiss the plaintiff's Amended Complaint without prejudice, and with leave to amend within 21 days of the docketing of the accompanying order, so that the plaintiff may properly allege the complaints she made in her opposition." Link
It’s interesting that Taitz points out that she will be “careful not to be Breitbarted or Fuddied,” indicating that she believes that both Andrew Breitbart and Andrew Breitbart and Loretta Fuddy were targeted by Obama for assassination.”
Given her record I think Taitz is of more value to Obama alive than dead.
Perhaps you have cause to criticize Taitz. But the judge's statement makes clear that the complaint was mooted by the actions of the SSA, not by the actions of Taitz.