Any semantical argument is beside the point. The Arctic ice cap is 50% larger based on satellite data than last year. Your graphs just don’t tell the story of how big the ice coverage was last year at this time.
There’s no argument about that. The measurements by the satellites don’t lie. The article was correct when it said the ice cap is significantly larger (over 50%).
Period. The global warming government funded crowd is wrong.
There is no crisis.
It’s not a semantic argument. The graph I posted a link to shows that Arctic sea ice is below the average level. It also shows the deep low for 2012, and how that dip in ice level is over.
Yes, last year was a record low, and this year is 50% more than last year, but it is still below the average.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.arctic.png
There is no crisis, yes, and Algor was wrong for sure.
