Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FL:Defensive Display and (warning shot) Bill Supported by Public Defenders, Opposed by Prosecutor
Gun Watch ^ | 20 December, 2013 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 12/19/2013 10:53:46 AM PST by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Questionable judgement in using a warning shot to stop an attack does not deserve a mandatory 10 years in jail when no one was hurt.
1 posted on 12/19/2013 10:53:46 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I have mixed feelings, an increase in indiscriminate shooting could endanger self defense laws in general.

If I pull the trigger I will have shirt buttons in my sights.

2 posted on 12/19/2013 10:59:51 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Lack of self-defense training leads to these types of cases too. I’m for it, but without the warning shots.


3 posted on 12/19/2013 11:02:22 AM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; MinuteGal; SoFloFreeper; left that other site; Joe Boucher; SeminoleCounty; ...

PINGeroo...


4 posted on 12/19/2013 11:13:37 AM PST by Old Sarge (And Good Evening, Agent Smith, wherever you are...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

While I am totally opposed to warning shots, I do support this bill. It is a shame that they conflated warning shots and brandishing, but that is the legislature for you.

Bearing arms explicitly means being able to show someone your weapon, or even taking aim with or without firing. It is stupid that current FL law requires you to shoot someone to ensure you are not prosecuted by the state persecutors.


5 posted on 12/19/2013 11:14:16 AM PST by antidisestablishment (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I don’t think you should even pull a gun unless you have cause. And you shouldn’t discharge it unless you are trying to stop someone from hurting you or someone else.


6 posted on 12/19/2013 11:16:06 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Prosecutorial misconduct is standard operating procedure in florida.


7 posted on 12/19/2013 12:12:04 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidisestablishment

Defensive display should be legal every where if one can prevent or stop a crime by merely showing that one is armed.

Seems like a good idea, the left hates the idea because it shows the usefulness of being armed.

Warning shots most of the time a bad idea. I know of a couple of times where they were used and the subject complied and wasn’t shot.

It takes a very special set of circumstances to considered them. One just can’t be popping rounds off into the air hoping for the best.


8 posted on 12/19/2013 12:27:49 PM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Stopping a criminal attack on oneself with out firing a shot sounds like a good idea to me.

Shooting some one no matter how justified brings on its own set on problems.

9 posted on 12/19/2013 12:30:29 PM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner

I just don’t think the chances of someone reversing course at the simple sight of a weapon is good odds. Some people think a gun is a magic wand and all they have to do is wave it.


10 posted on 12/19/2013 12:36:23 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver; All

What odds are you considering? I have been reading and writing about people using guns defensively for the last 40 years. Been doing it very intensively for the last five. The overwhelming majority (probably over 90+% of the time, the scenario is some variation of “someone shows a gun and the aggressor runs off”.


11 posted on 12/19/2013 12:59:41 PM PST by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; All

Odds of just showing a gun and the attacker runs away are low IMO but it depends on the circumstances.

Im just saying a gun shouldn’t be waved around like a magic wand. It should stay concealed until you have cause.


12 posted on 12/19/2013 1:03:22 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Why do you post your responses to All? You’ve done this several times. People can read the thread if they are interested but it seems curious as to why you have to shout out to everyone when there is someone that you disagree with.


13 posted on 12/19/2013 1:26:58 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I usually post to all because I believe that if people are interested enough in the thread to post to it then they are likely to be interested in responses.

I have been doing it for some time. I do not consider it “shouting”, which I reserve for using all caps. If the response is particularly to an individual, and is not meant for general interest, then I may not post it to all.

If someone is posting on a public forum, it is meant to be seen by many. Yours is the first complaint that I have had, and you would have been posted to if I had left the “all” off.

Sorry if I have offended you, that was not the intent.


14 posted on 12/19/2013 1:41:16 PM PST by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

A gun isn’t a magic wand, but I can guarantee racking a shotgun quickly gets people’s attention, and aiming a weapon without firing is not always a bad choice.

There are many times that just showing a weapon will deter criminals—of course that means being prepared to fire, and not just “waving it around.”


15 posted on 12/19/2013 1:41:17 PM PST by antidisestablishment (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: antidisestablishment

“There are many times that just showing a weapon will deter criminals—of course that means being prepared to fire, and not just “waving it around.”

Yep, I was always taught not to pull a firearm unless there was cause and you were ready to use it.

Doesn’t mean you have to shoot them, but firearms are deadly force and aren’t meant as warning devices.


16 posted on 12/19/2013 1:57:55 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

i too have mixed feelings. if this means it’s leagl to show a person you are armed so as to defuse the situation (as in pulling your coat back and putting your hand on your holstered weapon i’m for it. once the weapon leaves the holster the only shot is to the body. warming shots are dangerous and a lawyer can argue “if you had time for a warning shot, you weren’t in a life threatening position.”
if you are willing to draw you have to be willing to shoot and possibly kill. if you haven’t given that serious thought, you shouldn’t carry.


17 posted on 12/19/2013 4:05:38 PM PST by bravo whiskey (We should not fear our government. Our government should fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
look at how many shootings have been stopped because of a drawn weapon. that 22 year old guy in the oklahoma mall and this socialpath in colorado last week shot themselves because they knew an armed response was imminent.
18 posted on 12/19/2013 4:09:01 PM PST by bravo whiskey (We should not fear our government. Our government should fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey

If I draw I am committed to finishing the situation.


19 posted on 12/19/2013 4:09:39 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

>>I just don’t think the chances of someone reversing course at the simple sight of a weapon is good odds. Some people think a gun is a magic wand and all they have to do is wave it.<<

I have had it happen twice. Once all I needed was to show the holstered weapon, the other time I actually had to unholster it. The last thing I wanted to do was shoot the punk because of the time and money that would have cost me.


20 posted on 12/19/2013 6:31:45 PM PST by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson