Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MeshugeMikey
In the book "Unintended Consequences" the author talks about loading .44 magnum rounds with machined nylon bullets, supposedly highly effective at short range but with essentially no over penetration. I assume the cases would still be brass, although I used to buy nylon case and bullet .308 caliber practice rounds made in Sweden that would be pretty deadly at close range. Even those had brass rims to facilitate extraction.

I would be very curious under what provision of the constitution the Feds can ban manufacture of what is otherwise a legal product? As was noted in the article - you can make those parts legally by machining them. What is the difference between machining and 3D printing (hint: none, from a logical viewpoint).

5 posted on 12/01/2013 8:40:25 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Temporary tag line - RIP Paul Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Hardastarboard

logic thought is not the hobby of tyrants!

whats good for the goose..and all that.


6 posted on 12/01/2013 8:42:46 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ( Visit http://icantenroll.com/ In Glitch We Trust....;o})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Hardastarboard

They no longer follow the Constitution. After all, who is going to stop them?


8 posted on 12/01/2013 8:50:47 AM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson