Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: angry elephant

Barack Hussein Obama is definitely NOT the same brand as Bill Clinton. Bill’s saving grace is that he was probably sterile, but not necessarily free of STD’s. (Chelsea is her mother’s daughter, all right, but paternity has never been established.)

In fact, Obama’s actual DNA profile may be a closely held national secret, classified so high even the Russians don’t have a clear knowledge of who his actual birth parents are.

And Obama’s orientation is still s big blank in so many areas. We do know he is much enamored with Black Liberation Theology, and Marxist theory. His sexual proclivities have always been dicey, and nobody can point to a serious interaction in which he seemed in the least inclined to pay much attention to the female gender. Michelle is not so much his spouse, in the commonly accepted sense, as she is his handler established in close proximity so he does not stray too far from the life scripted for him, and to assure his adherence to the party line.

Once in a while Obama does go off script, and there is a vast amount of confusion and activity while the story is spun back into something like its previous orbit.

The story that Obama may have been the baby daddy of a now orphaned child is a little bit of a stretch, knowing his history and his inclinations. Besides, when did he have time?


17 posted on 11/29/2013 3:58:33 PM PST by alloysteel (The Internet, a most exquisite system by which to confound and muddle any reasonable dialogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel

Good Post. I thin the Rev. is wrong on this one. Like you said getting DNA from Obama would be an impossibility, he doesn’t want anyone to know that Frank Davis was his daddy.

Also until Jeremiah Wright fixed him up on the down low there is no evidence he ever had sex with a woman.


19 posted on 11/29/2013 4:05:08 PM PST by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: alloysteel
Michelle is not so much his spouse, in the commonly accepted sense, as she is his handler established in close proximity so he does not stray too far from the life scripted for him, and to assure his adherence to the party line.

You just described Valerie Jarrett. Yes, Michelle is just a paperweight to fulfill liberal's dream camelot.

54 posted on 11/29/2013 6:18:49 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson