To: Lazamataz
It has indeed come to this....
2 posted on
11/13/2013 7:31:12 AM PST by
ken5050
(Benghazi investigation update: "The plot thickens, like Hillary Clinton's ankles.." (longfellow")
To: ken5050
Somebody explain to me how pornography is not filmed prostitution.
6 posted on
11/13/2013 7:40:28 AM PST by
Louis Foxwell
(This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
To: ken5050
California unveils new Porn Protection Outfit.
17 posted on
11/13/2013 7:56:56 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
To: ken5050
My favorite from the comments was: fivekoverlibor • 17 hours ago − Yes, because the only thing standing in the way of a pornstar and the consequences of such employment choice is state-mandated eyewear. Solved. Well done, California.
36 posted on
11/13/2013 8:22:38 AM PST by
WMarshal
(Free citizen, never a subject or a civilian)
To: ken5050
Well is it didn’t come to this they wouldn’t need eye protection
46 posted on
11/13/2013 9:13:02 AM PST by
tophat9000
(Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson