[William Tell]

From the article: "While no arrests were made, Lavender says he will present the case to the county prosecutor for a possible charge of inciting panic."

I think that is going overboard. There is no justification for charging these innocent bank tellers with a crime. The didn't intentionally seek to incite panic. They simply need some education about the meaning of the Second Amendment.

[JimRed]

...a possible charge of inciting panic."

I think that is going overboard.

You are correct. To incite anything requires intent. The only intent noticeable is that of the sissy lib who called it in and the sheriff who decided the Second Amendment is "for me, not for thee".