Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!
Magistrate Judge Robinson
Posted on 11/03/2013 3:23:22 PM PST by ABrit
These allegations relate to the quid-pro-quo that caused Magistrate Judge Robinson to enter the improper and illegal order of dismissal of the Indictment of Elizabeth Duke. In return for her dismissal, she received extraordinary consideration in the prosecution of her son, Philip Robinson Winkfield, who was facing 40 years.
April 25, 2008 – Police arrest Philip Robinson Winkfield and seize five loaded guns, including two semiautomatic pistols, two shotguns and a semiautomatic assault rifle; a bullet resistant vest; 157 grams of heroin; 180 grams of crack; more than six pounds of marijuana and $8,000 cash.
May 23, 2008 – Winkfield indicted on State Drug offenses.
November 2008 – Obama elected President. U.S. Attorney took over the case from Maryland.
December 3, 2008 – Winkfield pleads guilty to being an armed heroin dealer. Judge Motz said: “This is not a cooperation agreement.”
April 8, 2009 – Motz enters order granting Winkfield’s Motion to Seal Documents.
April 10, 2009 – Winkfield – eligible for a 40 year sentence – is sentenced to five years in federal prison.
June 17, 2009 – Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson held a hearing at which the government made an Oral Motion to Dismiss Indictment and Quash Arrest Warrant as to Duke which was granted by Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson.
August 31, 2012 – Winkfield released after serving only 4.3 years of his five year sentence.
Judge Robinson – under threat that her son could be committed to Maryland State Prison where the threat of violence is much higher and knowing her son was facing 40 years in prison – caved to the Obama Administration’s demand to dismiss an indictment against the fugitive, domestic terrorist, Capitol-bombing Elizabeth Duke and signing the order impersonating an Article III judge. In return, her son received the velvet glove treatment.
(Excerpt) Read more at montgomeryblairsibley.com ...
If you didn't understand your Country has been taken over by Communists and Muslims, you should understand it now.
Elizabeth Duke is apparently no longer an Escape Risk —> she’s now an Escape Success.
Treason, your name is Hussein.
Husseins mother isn’t Stanley Ann?
It’s Elizabeth Duke?
Had to wear a double layer of tinfoil for this one......
Aliases:
Betty Ann Duke, Elizabeth Ann Duke, Betty Weir, “Betty Ann”
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/dt/elizabeth-anna-duke
Also aliased as Stanley Ann Dunham and originally Jo Ann Newman, mother to Malcolm X’s bastard son Shabazz/Obama. She is also Brother to Communist Traitor Fred D Newman.
To: yldstrk
Aliases: Betty Ann Duke,Elizabeth Ann Duke,Betty Weir,“Betty Ann” http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/dt/elizabeth-anna-duke
Also aliased as Stanley Ann Dunham and originally Jo Ann Newman,mother to Malcolm X’s bastard son Shabazz/Obama. She is also Brother to Communist Traitor Fred D Newman.
6 posted on Sun Nov 03 2013 18:57:36 GMT-0600 (CST) by ABrit [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies | Report Abuse]”
Links to your research h on this would be greatly appreciated! And this post deserves its own thread!
Magistrate Judge Robinson
Ya can’t tinfoil this one away.
United States of America,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Elizabeth Duke,
Defendant
Lost to the memory of most, Elizabeth Duke was indicted on May 11, 1988, along with six other individuals for acts of violence against the United States, including the bombing of the United States Capitol on November 7, 1983. A fuller description of the Indictment is contained in the United States Attorney’s 1988 Press Release regarding the Indictment. If you want to put Elizabeth Duke’s Indictment in historical context, I suggest The Evolution of a Modern Domestic Terrorist Group by James E. Wilson. After her arrest in 1985 in Pennsylvania, Elizabeth Duke was released on $300,000 bail over the strenuous objections of the United States Attorney. She subsequently failed to re-appear as ordered and a fugitive bench warrant was issued for her arrest………. - amoprobos.blogspot.com/2013/07/
http://moralmatters.org/tag/district-court-magistrate-judge-deborah-a-robinson/
Does the Martha article prove Elizabeth Duke = Stanley Ann Dunham?
Anyone have any pix of Elizabeth Duke?
Same for Jo Ann Newman?
(No, I won’t pay to read something)
That Post & Email link just points back to the Martha articles... and wants registration.
Hmmmm....
Post it here or as I said, on its own thread.
I think it’s important to understand that these researchers have invested a lot, risked a lot, and have been very special in actually doing real original research when others haven’t. It’s fair that they should pass the hat round. Most would do the same.
Martha is persuasive that Malcolm X is Obama’s Dad and links a long line of female alias’s for Obama’s Mum. I’m not connected to Martha, and it’s up to you if you want to register or not. I thought, and think it’s worth it.
Malcolm X was born “Malcolm Little” in Omaha, Nebraska on May 19, 1925.
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-obamas.html?m=1
Above is Mario apuzzo’s take on it. To make a long story short...
It
doesn’t
matter
He shows 0’s legal dad was 0 SR and that disqualifed 0 Jr from the presidency.
So I will search further for pics of
Jo Ann Newman
Elizabeth Duke
The thing is, they (Senate, Congress, Executive, Judiciary etc) all know Obama has US citizen parents, so he qualifies by natural birth to be US President. However, he or his masters hid the true identity of his parents because they were muslim communist traitors.
Cold case posse supporter, seizethecarp
Pinging y’all to this post by ABrit.
Anyone have 1960s era pictures of Elizabeth Duke and Jo Ann Newman?
This thread could use em.
ABrit quote:
“To: WildHighlander57
The thing is,they (Senate, Congress,Executive,Judiciary etc) all know Obama has US citizen parents,so he qualifies by natural birth to be US President. However, he or his masters hid the true identity of his parents because they were muslim communist traitors.
18 posted on Mon Nov 04 2013 18:02:52 GMT-0600 (CST) by ABrit [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies | Report Abuse]”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.