just proves the reset is way past due.
DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It’s a God given right, backed up by the Second Amendment you ugly witch.
She’s not talking about the First Amendment- she’s talking about a proposed reporter’s shield law, which would be, yes, a privilege.
Diane Feinstein might be happier in Somalia
It is NOT a privilege! That’s why it’s an AMENDMENT! It’s a guaranteed RIGHT! What an ASS!
Neck.
Rope.
Tree limb.
Some assembly required.
Well, it’s time for patriots to water the tree of liberty once again.
Unalienable means "given to us by God, which can cannot be given or taken away by man."
The amendments are not privileges.
A privilege is not an unalienable right.
A privilege denotes something that someone else can give or take away.
I think I would be embarrassed if I thought and spoke like Feinstein.
This is crazy. Now reporters in America need to get registered. That’s what they do here in China. In Beijing all reporters are required to undergo a 2-day seminar on CCP propaganda and take a test. You then have swear allegiance to the CCP. This requirement was launched shortly after I was kicked out of the Chinese media. The running joke in China is that if you don’t get fired in the Chinese media that means you are really in an incompetent reporter. When I got fired a few Chinese editors congratulated me for proving the truth of this joke.
She is supposed to rally Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution to the states which would repeal or effectively modify the 1st Amendment. And if the states chose to ratify such an amendment, highly unlikely imo, then Feinstein would be a hero.
Looks like Senator Cruz needs to give a constitutional lesson on the 1st Amendment to DiFi like he did on the 2nd.
Yeh Di be thankful its there or your lips would have been sewn shut a long time ago.
as far as her stated words go, sounds as if she is afraid of a 17 year old with a web-blog making comments; she defines him as not a bona fide journalist. She wants look back provisions to see if the 17 year old blogger was a bona fide journalist in the past, although not presently associated with any bona fide journalism entity.
do the scrutinized by the first amendment get to define who the scrutinizers are??
a 17 year old with a web blog is fine with me
if he spews untruths, let the public domain sort that out
after all the administration spews out untruths daily
do they need a special license to do so?
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
These f***ing elitists shouldn’t be in office long enough to worry about things like this, to be honest...
There would be no First Amendment without the Second Amendment.
I predicted this along time ago. Once the Second Amendment was take away from individuals, then obviously the same thing would happen to the First Amendment.
It is a privilege to say any thing you want “NO LAW” shall abridge that absolute right. None ,zero , Zip. So shout it out!!
Diane Feinstein is dumber than a Box of Barbara Boxers, and that’s saying something.