Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: 2010 Democratic losses were not because of Obamacare
Daily Caller ^ | October 23, 2013 | Alexis Levinson

Posted on 10/23/2013 12:37:49 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Democratic Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday she did not believe that Democrats’ major losses in the 2010 elections were because of Democratic votes for Obamacare, blaming them instead on TARP.

In 2010, Republicans picked up 63 House seats, gaining the majority and taking control of the House. The losses are usually blamed on the vote for the unpopular Affordable Care Act, which was signed into law earlier that year. Pelosi argued at a press conference Wednesday that she did not believe that to be the case.

“I don’t even buy into the idea that we lost the election because of healthcare,” she said. “One of the most damaging votes that our members had to take was the TARP, 700 plus billion dollars to bail out Wall Street in the view of the public. We didn’t see it that way. We saw it as rescuing our economy from a financial services meltdown.”

“People never even got over that vote,” she argued of TARP. “It really in some ways gave birth to the tea party. Because they did not like what they viewed as the Wall Street bailout. And certainly the Occupy [Movement], who have a good more in common than they may know. But that was really the vote that sort of soured people. They didn’t like that vote at all. And they judged many other things in light of” it.

“I think that was probably the toughest vote members had to take,” she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Health/Medicine; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2010; gophouse; obamacare; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: C. Edmund Wright

as was TARP


41 posted on 10/23/2013 3:35:50 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

What are you saying?


42 posted on 10/23/2013 5:20:16 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

TARP is another example of “the size, scope, reach, cost and intrusiveness of the Fed gov”


43 posted on 10/23/2013 7:34:55 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson