Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Calamari

“:The problem is that they should not need to repel or neutralize an attack when not in a combat zone.”\

There is no such thing. ALL military personnel are considered war fighters at all times. They are targets at all times. The military must always be run as such. Of course it isn’t and that has invited attacks.

I can guarantee you that in one particular unit where we are armed at all times no one would think for a nanosecond about using violence against us. Unarmed, PC, pansy military offices are prime targets for frustrated cowards.

I am of the belief that all officers should be armed at all times with a sidearm and all enlisted the same if not issued a rifle where practical.


84 posted on 09/17/2013 4:04:47 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad
I am of the belief that all officers should be armed at all times with a sidearm and all enlisted the same if not issued a rifle where practical.

So a perp starts shooting up someplace on a base. All within hearing distance draw or shoulder their weapons and move toward the sound of the gun fire. Upon arriving at the scene they find another group of armed soldiers. Who do they shoot?

As I said before, I am not anti-gun. We are going to disagree about this issue.

BTW what does your screen name "CodeToad" refer to? computer coding or Morse code?

90 posted on 09/17/2013 6:27:30 PM PDT by Calamari (Pass enough laws and everyone is guilty of something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson