Posted on 09/09/2013 2:37:19 AM PDT by markomalley
Witness the birth of a hashtag.
The suggestion for a topic:
FTW RT @dfgalvin: @gabrielmalor that was supposed to be "No blood for O"—
Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) September 08, 2013
A hashtag is applied:
#NoBloodForO RT @gabrielmalor: FTW RT @dfgalvin: @gabrielmalor that was supposed to be "No blood for O"—
jon gabriel (@ExJon) September 08, 2013
With that, “no blood for oil” had found its shortened contemporary version: #NoBloodForO. And with that, many tweeters were off and running:
#NoBloodForO No soldiers should die just for a president to save face.—
Redness (@mchastain81) September 08, 2013
This is NOT why I joined Al Qaeda! #NoBloodForO http://t.co/KdWeg1zSeQ—
Christopher Cantwell (@voteforcantwell) September 09, 2013
#NoBloodForO but somebody should tell him the golfing is great in Syria! http://t.co/92PCnjH2Oh—
Ditto Diana (@thehairtech) September 09, 2013
#NoBloodForO because his hypocrisy is exceeded only by his hubris and his insensitivity only by his incompetence.—
Jennifer Weber (@JennyPennifer) September 09, 2013
Not a peep out of O 4 #Benghazi but all the *sturm und drang* he can muster 4 #Syria. Still he cares 4 no one but himself. #NoBloodForO—
Jennifer Weber (@JennyPennifer) September 09, 2013
#NoBloodForO Because Americans shouldn't die for a President who would abandon them and then lie about their deaths to win an election.—
Harold Nikiforakis (@Nikk1066) September 09, 2013
#NoBloodForO How can anyone trust him to run a " military intervention" after what happened at #Benghazi ?—
Carla Greathouse (@CarlaGreathouse) September 09, 2013
#NoBloodForO. Just checked the TelePrompTer and guess what? It's time for another vacation. #laserfocus—
(@arborist43) September 09, 2013
Let's take a break from being the Chief of the World Police. #NoBloodForO—
(@CounterMoonbat) September 09, 2013
#NoBloodForO it was just ketchup! http://t.co/OmBPJSJM3w—
Ditto Diana (@thehairtech) September 09, 2013
#NoBloodForO unless he decides to do the dumbest thing fathomable and disregard the people's will as well as congress and start #WWIII—
OpinionOfAGem (@geminiangel1980) September 09, 2013
Your Syrian rebels all passed background checks, right? #NoBloodForO—
KH (@Kittyhawken) September 09, 2013
Can anyone name another Nobel Peace Prize winner in the history of the award that had such a hard-on to start a war? #NoBloodForO—
Mr_Popular (@Real_Mr_Popular) September 09, 2013
Where are all the anti-war celebs these days?
Have you seen me? goo.gl/STHxhd Please help find the missing anti-war celebrities #nobloodforO http://t.co/rV2nEDf71Z—
Conservapedia (@jay_pe) September 09, 2013
Jarring to see liberals on the #NoBloodForO hashtag brag that Obama is just like Bush.—
jon gabriel (@ExJon) September 09, 2013
Which leads us to this: As with any good hashtag, there were those objecting, because dissent ceased to be patriotic four and a half years ago:
#NoBloodForO It's right there in the hashtag. The only reason conservatives are against it is because Obama is for it.—
Al Turnell (@DemocratAl) September 09, 2013
A retort to that is simple:
RT @NumbersMuncher: #NoBloodForO Because Senator Obama would want it that way.—
WhiteHousePressCorps (@whpresscorps) September 08, 2013
Can somebody please make that into a bumper sticker?
My personal favorite is #sand... My kids don’t get it.
bump
bump
I oppose becoming allies with AL Qaeda
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.