Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do you really believe they’re going to pay off this debt?
vinsuprynowicz.com ^ | 6 June, 2010 | Vin Suprynowicz

Posted on 09/06/2013 7:18:25 PM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Vince Ferrer
I was told by a banker that the FDIC insures up to a certain amount, but they have up to 30 years to complete paying it! Personally, I would keep any money in one bank under $100,000 just in case that limit in one bank ever gets lowered. Besides that if a bank goes under, there will probably be some amount exempt from scheming.

It'll be real easy to consifcate the money with the "blame the old geezers" mentality in the US. That money (except the Roth) hasn't been taxed. All that needs to be done is to raise the tax rate on money taken out of IRAs.

21 posted on 09/07/2013 10:09:57 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grania
I would keep any money in one bank under $100,000 just in case that limit in one bank ever gets lowered.

I wouldn't have any money in a big bank, especially one that is a too big to fail, because those will be the ones that will fail. Find a credit union to keep your money, they are insured by a different agency than FDIC, and are in much better condition.

And in a couple of years, it would probably be best to have your money outside the system, in your mattress.

22 posted on 09/07/2013 10:19:12 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer; All

I would not keep more than a few thousand in physical cash. Cash is hardest hit by inflation, and is subject to a change of the currency.

No answer is perfect. Having some assets in another country might be helpful, but it is becoming harder and harder to do.


23 posted on 09/07/2013 11:43:01 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MrKatykelly
Obviously it could cause a worldwide panic and depression of untold dimensions

I'm not familiar enough with history to know for sure, but my impression is that when there were bank panics and the government didn't act against them, many people whose life-savings investments were suddenly exposed as worthless got wiped out but money ended up in the hands of people who could restart the economy in the aftermath.

The problem with depressions and recessions of 1929 and afterward is that the government has required that money which could be used to restart the economy must instead be used to prop up the appearance of value in people's investments. While protecting people's savings from being wiped out might superficially seem like a good thing, it fundamentally doesn't work. If a factory can't afford to buy the raw materials necessary to make product, having it sold off to someone with the capital to buy those raw materials might not seem ideal, but letting the factory stay barely afloat despite its inability to buy raw materials won't really help anyone. If the owner's credit is sufficiently overextended that he can't afford raw materials, the only way the factory will become productive is if it is sold. The sooner that happens, the sooner everyone can get to work.

It's unfortunate that the only way a crash can happen without the government blocking the steps necessary for recovery will be if the crash, and the recovery steps, are both sufficiently large that the government is powerless to do anything about them. The effects of such a crash on things like infrastructure maintenance and security are apt to result in damage there which could impede speedy economic recovery even if it should otherwise be possible.

24 posted on 09/07/2013 2:42:13 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

Every investment (or even savings account) you’ve made is someone else’s debt; if their debt is cancelled, so is your investment.


25 posted on 09/07/2013 6:02:31 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson