I’m definitely seeing nothing like what you’re implying in those photos. They’re pretty generic actually. Mountain out of a mole hill making you are.
Almost every person who commented below the article saw what he implied.
The Clinton "marriage" has long been the topic of much speculation and gossip inside the Beltway. Now this, in Politico, of all places..second..the word "close" has a strong suggestive undercurrent...and with a "?" in the header...that's not the way to avoid raising the question..it all but guarantees it..
I’m not seeing anything unusual either. Besides, even if you had photos of them kissing Hillary could just shrug and say “What difference does it make?”.
Have to agree with post 6 saganite.
we can beat her with facts; don’t need the hype.
Yes pretty innocuous. The pictures show (1) they have a close working relationship and (2) they’re both ugly as hell.