If you were to drag this selected text to another computer file, what would happen? The purple text 'YES' would have a black halo around it. Why? Because when the word 'YES' was selected, the selection was expanded by a couple of pixels, resulting in a black halo around the text. This is how the white halos around the bc lines and text occurred, when the fake green security paper background was added behind it.
“This is how the white halos around the bc lines and text occurred, when the fake green security paper background was added behind it.”
So if the foregoing forged file with cut-and-paste text that was added to a fake secutity paper background was printed out as a hardcopy, it would have halos, correct?
Then if that forged hardcopy with halos was fed into a Xerox 7655 scanner, compressed with MRC and sent via e-mail as a pdf to a Mac, it would show all of the features of NBC’s test scans shared with the WH pdf...PLUS it would still have halos...halos that are NOT accounted for by any Xerox 7655 replication efforts by NBC’s own admission, so far, correct?
I suspect that Garrett Papit is hard at work refining his mock-up “original” documents and feeding them into a Xerox 7655 both with and without halos to see what the Xerox does with them. Of course, he would also open them in Preview, invert them and save them on a Mac.
In any case, I am glad that one of Mike Zullo’s primary pdf consultants is aware of the replication claims of NBC and is in a position to try to replicate them himself.