Replies

A BC attested “a complete and true copy” would show “late” or “amended” on it. The reason this has not been provided is that any amendment(s) would not stand scrutiny.

HRS §338-17 Late or altered certificate as evidence. The probative value of a “late” or “altered” certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.

"The probative value of a “late” or “altered” certificate..."
__

So? We're not talking about a late or altered certificate or, for that matter, any birth certificate at all.

We are talking about a Letter of Verification which, as a self-authenticating document, is prima facie proof of the information it contains.

You can dance all you like around the edges, but the law is clear. The fact that you're not happy with a Letter of Verification is completely immaterial. In the eyes of the law, it is authentic until proven otherwise.

As I've said before, if you think it's been proven to be inauthentic, please tell us the details. Unless and until it's been legally determined to be inauthentic, the President's birth data are considered to be what the Letters of Verification say they are -- which, not surprisingly, also corresponds to what the COLB and the LFBC say.

Again, you are free to provide prof to the contrary.