Per NBC:
“Is that it? Just the Halos? Did I miss something? Surely there are more artifacts that were claimed to be evidence of a forgery and which can be explained through the workflow I propose?”
Perhaps NBC will respond to thecodont’s question and comment #155...
“I am not an expert on this, but would Xerox be using a grayscale (8 bit) to black and white (2-bit) conversion for scans of these text images? Grayscale, of course, provides more information for further processing. You would have to have multiple scans of 8-bit to 2-bit of the same test image and then examine the results under a magnifying glass.”
NBC responds as follows to thecodont’s question in comment #155:
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/08/10/seizethecarp-question-155/
“Seizethecarp: your question has been addressed in the blog posting responding to Butterdezillion.
“If you have any further questions, I am more than happy and willing to address them.”
Thecodont, I am not sure where it was addressed. Maybe you can tell. I will leave it to you or others to follow up with NBC if you wish to, as this is outside my area of expertise.
NBC has posted a detailed rebuttal of WND’s cut-and-paste accusation:
I hope that Zullo will release the Hayes affidavit and that Zebest and the other experts he consulted will take on these new claims by NBC point by point before any more politicians are invited to stick their necks out over the claim that the pdf was forged.
Even if the pdf image can be replicated from a paper document, the LFBC image may still have been forged or altered prior to being fed into the WH Xerox copier!