Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MMaschin
Also, zoom in to the box next to "Twin" in section 3, and the box next to "Yes" in section 7G. Those two boxes are exactly the same, pixel for pixel. No way for that to happen, except for a digital cut/paste.

It's obvious that the BC that was used as the basis for the forgery was one from a twin. One empty box in section 4 was copied over another box in section 4, because for a single birth they should all be blank. And the box next to "Yes" in section 7G, was copied over the box next to "Twin", in section 3. These were done to hide the facts that the BC was for a multiple birth.
120 posted on 08/09/2013 12:12:41 PM PDT by MMaschin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: MMaschin
The idiotic obots would want you to believe that after this form was created by hand, photographed to microfilm, printed onto security paper, and then scanned into a pdf, that the two boxes would be exactly the same?!

Puts things in context. And as you say, there are multiple duplicate pairs.

Just another "coincidence" (dismissive hand wave). /s

124 posted on 08/09/2013 12:34:31 PM PDT by Ray76 ( Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

I remember looking at that. The two boxes are exact copies. Down to every pixel. That was a shock.

These people doing these tests with the zerox are the same scuzzbags that will defend an abortion in the ninth month. Believing anything they say is foolish.

Whores, pimps, Democrats, all the same to me.


136 posted on 08/09/2013 7:50:20 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson