“Where is the downloadable 100% replicated pdf file made by copying a hard copy LFBC image using this claimed Xerox workflow methodology...a pdf file with the same “floating” signature block as the WH pdf?”
At the site you provided a link to.
“Zoom in on the signatures. Notice how the parts that stay on the green background are touching one of the horizontal lines that form the border of box 18a. Those parts of the signatures and also the letters from the box 18a label were treated as an image, separated to the image layer and compressed as an image, while the rest of the signatures were treated as text and compressed as text.
After all the Preview metadata is written all over the document, it saves in PDF 1.3 format.
1. The document was scanned on a Xerox WorkCentre 7655
2. The document was emailed
3. The ocument was opened in preview and found to be upside down
4. The document was rotated and saved in preview
This explains all the important artifacts including the presence of the JPEG comment and the Quantization matrices, it explains how JBIG2 was used and yet it was encoded in FlateDecode, it even explains the margins added by preview. And the monochrome bitmaps also show indication of the scanning process and their alignments again match the expectations and predictions.”
“This explains all the important artifacts...”
So where is this pdf file claimed to have replicated “all the important artifacts” made available to other researchers to enable verification of these claims of replication?
Looks like BS without the claimed “replicated” pdf file!