Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: InHisService
Contrary to what people think, one does not need a "license" to drive.

One has an inherent right to peaceably travel from place-to-place in this country via any contemporary conveyance without being harassed by armed government employees.

Wars were fought and won over this.

10 posted on 07/31/2013 1:55:13 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: elkfersupper

People will refuse to believe this regardless how much evidence you put in front of their face.


Here is a compilation of court cases supporting Traveling is a Right, not a privilege.

Barron v Burnside - 121 US 186

Boone v Clark - 214 SW 607

Buchanan v Warley - 245 US 60, 74

Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago - 169 NE 22

Cummins v Jones - 155 P. 171

Deibel v Dreiss - 50 NE 2d 1000 (1943)

Ferrante Equipment Co v Foley Machinery Co - NJ 213 A.2d 208, 211, 49 NJ 432

Gardner v City of Brunswick - 28 SE 2d 135

Hadfield v Lundin - 98 Wn 657; 168 P. 516

Hale v Henkel - 201 US 43

Hoke v Henderson - 15 NC 15, 25 AM Dec.677

In re Hong Wah - 82 Fed 623

Kent v Dulles - 357 US 116, 125

Ligare v Chicago - 28 NE 934

McKevitt et al v. Golden Age Breweries Inc - 126 P.2d 1077 (1942)

Miranda v Arizona - 384 US 436, 491 (1966)

Murdock v Pannsylvania - 319 US 105

O’Conner v. City of Moscow - 69 Idaho 37

Packard v Banton - 44 SCt 257, 264 US 140

Parish of Morehouse v Brigham - 6 S 257

Parish v Thurston - 87 Ind 437 (1882)

People v Nothaus - 147 Colo 210

Robertson v Dept of Public Works - 180 Wash 133 at 139

Rogers Construction Co v Hill, Or - 384 P.2d 219, 222, 235 Or 352

Spann v City of Dallas - 235 SW 513

State v City of Spokane - 109 Wn 360; 186 P. 864

State v Johnson - 243 P.1073

Thompson v Smith (Chief of Police) - 154 SE 579, 580

Weirich v State - 140 Sis 98

Wells v Zenz - 236 P. 485

Western Turf Assn. v Greenberg - 204 US 359

Williams v Fears - 343 US 270, 274


40 posted on 07/31/2013 2:45:28 PM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: elkfersupper
Actually, your right to travel unrestricted is a traditional right that is supposed to be a legal freedom from before the founding of this great nation.

However, if you wish to obtain a "Driver's Licence", then THAT is a privilege that can be restricted, since the legal definition of a "Driver" is: 'someone who transports another person or persons for hire'. Paraphrasing since I cannot find My copy of Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. since the last change in physical location.

42 posted on 07/31/2013 3:15:03 PM PDT by Utilizer (what does not kill you... -can sometimes damage you QUITE severely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: elkfersupper

LOL!
Yeah, and contrary to what people think, income taxes are voluntary so you don’t have to file returns or pay them.

Good luck with all that.

The former “America” may have been a place of liberty, but that nation is long dead.


64 posted on 07/31/2013 8:38:46 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson