In addition, he accuses the jurors of not understanding the case when they sat there day in and day out in the court room, took notes and deliberated for 16 1/2 hours. It is he, the low information, ignorant person who doesn’t understand the FACTS of the case.
The race baiters thought there should have been blacks on that jury. We all know that if there had been - they would have voted for race and not on the facts of the case.
Where do these ignorant, low-information people come from?
The inner city public school systems. These are people that believe facts should come secondary to feelings. Remember the 2000 Florida voting debacle. There were people who claimed they were confused by the ballot, never mind that they tested that ballot on third graders after wards and they could figure it out, and believed they should have the right to re vote. Not in 2004, but then. Now, if you screw up a ballot, in a normal world you would have to wait till the next election and be more careful. That's the law. However, these are the same people who thought their feelings should override the rule of law.
You're seeing the same thing here