Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does the "equal protection clause" prevent states from guaranteeing public union pensions?
one man's opinion.....

Posted on 07/23/2013 11:12:28 AM PDT by ken5050

OK..I'm not a lawyer...haven't even stayed at a Holiday Inn Express in over a decade, and apologies to all in advance if this a dumb question. But I know there are lots of smart folks, even smart lawyers, here.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: chapter9; detroit; michigan; rosemaryaquillina
We've all been following the news out of Detroit, specifically how a circuit judge has stopped the city from filing bankruptcy. Her basis for this action is the clause in the state constitution that bars any change in the pensions of government ( state and local) employees.

I gather that some 20 other states have similar laws on the books.

But doesn't that violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment, which says that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

After all, the Michigan statute doesn't say that the state is forced to pony up the $$ to fund Detroit's public pensions..just that they can't be changed.

So, aren't the citizens who work for private entities entitled to the same?

1 posted on 07/23/2013 11:12:28 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ken5050

If it is not bonded debt, which for most states is the only permitted debt, I would think the actual issue would be separation of powers: Can a previous administration detail the actions of a future administration? If that is the case, couldn’t it apply to all facets of local and state government? Force in a 50 year budget that every future administration is tied to?


2 posted on 07/23/2013 11:17:33 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I suspect federal bankruptcy law controls as to the State Constitution.

For example, if I owe you $100 and the state constitution says it can’t be changed, it can still be discharged in bankruptcy court.


3 posted on 07/23/2013 11:18:55 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

The GM “bankruptcy” proved that the law says what the regime wants it to say.


4 posted on 07/23/2013 11:25:09 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
The GM “bankruptcy” proved that the law says what the regime wants it to say.

And this was further solidified by Roberts' opinion in the Obamacare ruling. We no longer have a functioning Constitution, so any discussions thereof is moot. We might as well be arguing how many Obamas can dance on the head of a pin.

5 posted on 07/23/2013 11:46:51 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo ( Walker 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

It was ludicrous in the first place for units of government to guarantee the pensions. In private industry pension contributions by both employee and employer are made into third party pension funds and employer contributions generally cease once the employee leaves or retires. Employees then draw off this accumulated fund for their pensions. As I understand what is happening is that these retirees are basically still on the payroll of the unit of government when they retire so that the government is paying not only current employees who are providing services, but also retirees until they die. It begs the question where all that pension money went in Detroit.


6 posted on 07/23/2013 12:01:56 PM PDT by The Great RJ (construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

under obamacare, i heard, muslims amish and native american are exempt. so much for equal protection


7 posted on 07/23/2013 12:03:31 PM PDT by Donnafrflorida (Thru HIM all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
"It begs the question where all that pension money went in Detroit."

Into campaign coffers. Guess which party benefited.

8 posted on 07/23/2013 12:07:39 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

My concern is the fact that we the people aren’t protected from public sector unions. We’re held hostage to their demands.


9 posted on 07/23/2013 12:08:18 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Cop Union Boss Boasts of Beating Lawmakers With Flashlights: If Soldiers Don’t Have Unions, Why Do Police and Teachers?

"We intend to walk into Lansing after the summer break and ask the Republicans who have been so eagerly screwing us, 'who's next?' If we cannot earn their respect we will do what we have always done; hit it with a flashlight until we gain compliance."

Anybody see the problem?

10 posted on 07/23/2013 12:13:51 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Well,

(1) Since states and municipalities may not legally incur off-balance sheet debt and

(2) Since unfunded pension obligations and other non-bonded “contractual” obligations ARE in fact off-balance sheet debt and

(3) Since Detroit’s “outside” legal counsel allowed Detroit to illegaly create those obligations by failing to fund those future payment liabilities with current-period deposits calculated by professional actuaries,

It follows that Detroit’s “outside” legal counsel is LIABLE for those missing deposits now. It will probably be necessary to ‘claw back’ payments made to the “outside” counsel’s ‘partners’ — going back several years.

I can’t tell you how sad that makes me...


11 posted on 07/23/2013 12:23:02 PM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Into campaign coffers. Guess which party benefited.

************************************************

Maybe the mayors symbol of power can lend a clue .. lets take a look..


12 posted on 07/23/2013 1:11:45 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Democrats have been fighting against Equal Protection since 1824. So this is one part of the Constitution that they will continue to ignore.


13 posted on 07/23/2013 2:10:23 PM PDT by Hoodat (BENGHAZI - 4 KILLED, 2 MIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Equal protection clause? What’s that? Constitution? Huh?

Murder by abortion — now *that’s* equal protection. /s

Thanks ken5050.


14 posted on 07/23/2013 4:06:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring; ken5050

Regarding the state lawsuit to halt the Detroit bankruptcy, the federal bankruptcy judge ruled today that “... federal courts will decide if Detroit is eligible for bankruptcy, staying challenges to the bankruptcy in state court.”


15 posted on 07/24/2013 12:01:40 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson