[Steve_Seattle]

The facts as presented here are confusing. Lott says she had a restraining order against him, you say there was a restraining order against her. Does a restraining order always imply mutuality, as a matter of common sense?

Also, its not clear where and how she got the gun - did she leave the husband's premises, get the gun from somewhere else, and come back? Anyway, 20 years seems pretty stiff given the background of the case and the husband's testimony.

[mvpel]

I read that she went to her car to get the gun and came back in.