AFFIRMATIVE re-ACTION.. How far will we allow this to go???

Cooking With Chef Carlo ^ | July 11, 2013 | Carlo3b, Dad, Chef, Author

[carlo3b]

In a time when the Supreme Court is dissembling of the mechanisms that 50 years of forced segregation were established to insure fairness, the administration has raised the bar to include forced AFFIRMATIVE re-Action to the body politic.. If the Democrat constituency feel that they perceive an injustice in their own terms then the full weight of the federal Government should interfere...

[carlo3b]

Is this the straw? Where is the camel, and where is his nose, NOW?

[carlo3b]

Behind our back the President is really working hard.. Check out this link..

http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/rush-zimmerman-shouldnt-be-on-trial/

[carlo3b]

Attorney General (and later Supreme Court Justice) Robert Jackson once commented: “If the prosecutor is obliged to choose his cases, it follows he can choose his defendants.”

This method results in “[t]he most dangerous power of the prosecutor: that he will pick people he thinks he should get, rather than pick cases that need to be prosecuted.” Prosecutors could easily fall prey to the temptation of “picking the man, and then searching the law books . . . to pin some offense on him.”

[Wurlitzer]

Affirmative action created on the democrat plantation proving liberals know blacks are inferior and therefore government must discriminate against whites to make it “fair”.

Even though no black alive was a slave in the USA but you can sure make a case the producers in this country have been made slaves by having the fruit of their labors stolen by government and given to the dregs of society. Theft and slavery just government sanctioned.