Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
Lame. Waste of time.

Even if the House voted to impeach, you have to remember it's Harry Reid's Senate that woul try him.

Snowball's in hell woul stand a better chance.

10 posted on 07/09/2013 7:52:04 AM PDT by NorCoGOP (Obama's approval ratings: so low that Kenyans now accuse him of being born in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NorCoGOP

This does not require impeachment. He will be removed from office along with the arrest of Mr Reid.


12 posted on 07/09/2013 7:55:30 AM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Even if the House voted to impeach, you have to remember it's Harry Reid's Senate that woul try him.

Then, let him wear the much-deserved impeachment around his neck for the remainder of his days. He deserves nothing less.

16 posted on 07/09/2013 8:08:04 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP

Impeachment is a political act of the Legislative Branch.

Criminal acts are prosecuted by the Judicial Branch.

Document forgery, fraud, etc, are criminal acts. A person committing these acts is liable for prosecution; holding Office is no shield, these are not Official acts which would be shielded.

Conviction and imprisonment would be insurmountable disabilities necessitating impeachment.

Of course these particular criminal acts would mean that there is no President and therefore impeachment is impossible. The Constitution demands that “No Person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President”, it can not then require that an ineligible person be impeached. To contend otherwise would negate Article II’s imperative that “No Person except a natural born Citizen... be eligible”. A person who is not President can not be impeached. Not only is it illogical to impeach an ineligible person, such a reading is an invalid construction.


41 posted on 07/09/2013 12:33:51 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP; areukiddingme1; saganite

So I guess you all would much prefer that Zullo and Arpaio and anyone else trying to get at the truth about the Freak In Chief should curl up and die and give up trying to do anything.

Your defeatism sickens me.


73 posted on 07/09/2013 8:37:13 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP

Remember, you can’t impeach a ‘president’ that was never qualified to be ‘president’ in the first place.

He’s an usurper. He should be arrested for treason by the joint chiefs along with most of his fellow democrats.

If there’s a way to save the Republic before it’s too late then we should do it. This may be our last chance.


85 posted on 07/09/2013 10:53:16 PM PDT by Bullish (Psalm 46)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson