Logically, the motion should have been granted. However, the Judge made the proper ruling in light of the big picture. The media, the White House and the poverty pimps would have caused massive social upheavel had the motion been granted. Sad to say it, t but the denial very likely saved innocent lives. That’s a sad commentary on our society.
Yes, it is better that one innocent should suffer, than a thousand criminals go free.
do I really need the sarcasm tag here?
Disagree that this ruling saved lives, it may have saved one, hers !! Unless there is a guilty verdict there will be riots and lives lost. Liberal race baiters will see to that !
As a matter of law the state proved NADA, she should have thrown out the case as soon as the motion landed on her bench! If there is a guilty verdict she should set it aside - but she won’t have the courage to do so.
This whole trial is a sham perpetrated by the race-baiter culter fostered by Jesse and Al.. Wait for the “no justice, no peace” slogans to start ringing again !!
you have a point there, but a bad one
The trial is about Zimmerman, and only him. Outside factors should not decide his fate, especially not any “innocent lives that might be saved” outside the court.
Would you be willing to go to jail if you were innocent but the judge said “we are going to throw you in jail anyway or else rioters will kill innocent people”
The judge might possibly have saved this mess if she had granted it.
Even Better, the state could avoid a mess by saying “in light of the recent testimony which contradicts our original investigation the state would like to drop all charges”
That puts it back on the idiot witnesses
Did it really save innocent lives, or just kick that can a little farther down the road?
On the upside, should Zimmerman be acquitted, he will never be tried for this again because of this motion. If it had been granted, the state could have attempted to bring charges against him in the future.