I agree. Her means of conveying crucial messages to the American people are through speech and writing. In my opinion, both must be improved. Maybe, then, she could educate, influence, and inspire that larger percentage of the population who, at present, tune her out.
I think part of what you’re referring to, is the fact that Palin is a woman.
Cut her some slack. She is awesome.
Sheesh.
Reagan was good in large measure thanks to the years he practiced his acting craft, but he, the man, wasn't an act and his American beliefs and ideals were not a script or a speech prepared for him, but were formed and tested through his scholarship and study and our multiple hot, warm and cold wars.
Sarah Palin is a natural and seems to have the American heart and mind, but not the practice and it's not likely she'll get what she needs off the campaign trail or out of office and away from the constant exposure and speaking practice.
After thinking over their methods and results, I can't shake the feeling that McLame picked her simply to take her out as a future candidate.
Nothing about McLame's candidacy said "I want to WIN!" He and Romney both appeared as though they had no intention of winning any election other than the Republican primary.
The results speak for themselves.