Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick; JoeProBono

The issue was that Bao changed his testimony, informed Prosecution, but not Defense.

BDLR produced a piece of paper where he had written (note scribbled along margin ?) down (although it can’t be proven WHEN he wrote that note) that the witness had stated during REHEARSAL a time period of 1-3 minutes.

The Judge accepted that as proof BDLR didn’t know and that was why he didn’t tell Defense.


107 posted on 07/06/2013 7:56:23 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

The Bao testimony seems like it could benefit from an entire article devoted to it.


203 posted on 07/06/2013 10:46:34 AM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson