Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kennard
This article from 16 Feb 2012 looks to be a good primer on thorium vs. uranium.
38 posted on 07/04/2013 2:37:35 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: 103198
Nuclear Engineering PING
39 posted on 07/04/2013 2:45:25 PM PDT by 103198 (It's the metadata stupid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
This article from 16 Feb 2012 looks to be a good primer on thorium vs. uranium.

As the Forbes article implies, in twenty years, India and China will have left us in the dust in both uranium and thorium-fueled reactors: in research, design, construction and operation. The U.S. might be best served to concentrate its energies solely on Thorium.

This capital-intense field requires massive government research sponsorship.

46 posted on 07/04/2013 4:17:59 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson