I love free enterprise. I do not, however, consider deception to be a form of free enterprise. When one engages in an activity, absent of full disclosure, then I have no use for them or whatever wares they may be attempting to pedal. You see, I am quite cynical in that regard.
Deception? The thread is posted in “Bloggers and Personal”. That’s a hint that it might just be a “Blogger” posting from his/her blog. See how easy that is to figure out? Then there is that “link”, highlighted in red no less, which we all know leads us to a different page/site (well most of us who think for ourselves understand it does) so again, those of us who can think for ourselves understand fully that we will need to go to that page/site to read the rest if we are interested. It’s pretty obvious to those of us who can think for ourselves. No “deception” involved. Maybe with just a little more time and experience those who think there is “deception” will catch on?
>>When one engages in an activity, absent of full disclosure, then I have no use for them or whatever wares they may be attempting to pedal.<<
How odd. It’s posted in “Bloggers and Personal”, there is a link highlighted in red, and it says “Excerpt”. Still you insist it’s “absent of full disclosure”. Wow! I would suggest that if you have “no use for them” it would best to just not open that thread. It’s not like someone high jacked a thread but wasn’t interested in commenting on information being discussed causing the rest of us to have to wade through their attempts at becoming a liberal.
>>You see, I am quite cynical in that regard.<<
Looks more like liberal control issues to me.