Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ladysforest
The name was amended TWO WEEKS after the date of birth. Might that have been the cause of the delay in the funeral arrangements? I tend to discount the he said she said and look only at the limited evidence we do have.

How could the parents have buried her as Tomiyo according to the death certificate...

The number of her birth certificate shows her to have been born two weeks AFTER she died...I guess that can only happen in Hawaii?

Wasn't there a delay in her funeral arrangements? Did the family need to wait for the amended document before she could be buried?

But more to the point, what happened to the certificate number GIVEN TO TOMIYO SUHAHARA. Is that number 10611 the MEAN ABSOLUTE ERROR?

329 posted on 06/25/2013 3:54:04 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

There was no delay in her burial. The Interrogator went to both of the cemeteries where she was buried and was given decent answers to her questions. A deceased newborn does NOT need a BC or have to be “named” prior to being buried. I personally spoke with one of the cemeteries and they were helpful with answers.

Virginia was moved from her original resting place and reburied with her father sometime after he had died.

Our researcher spoke with Mrs. Sunahara at length. I have never posted that video out of respect to Mrs. Sunahara.

http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/10-virginia-sunahara-research-results/


334 posted on 06/25/2013 4:09:05 PM PDT by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson