[edge919]

It says right on the manual that it was for classifying births that took place in 1961, doofus.

And I'm telling you one more time, so that it will sink in. The classifications do not jibe with the 1961 natality report. You can bleep and blurt all you want, but this is a problem you cannot explain away.

[Jeff Winston]

And I'm telling you one more time, so that it will sink in. The classifications do not jibe with the 1961 natality report. You can bleep and blurt all you want, but this is a problem you cannot explain away.

No, it isn't.

It's COMPLETE AND UTTER BULL****.

You can't produce ANY CONFLICT WHATSOEVER with a 1961 natality report.

[Jeff Winston]

Just because you make some BULL**** claim: (”The classifications do not jibe with the 1961 natality report”) doesn’t make it true.

Have you never heard of a little thing called SHOW ME THE DAMN EVIDENCE?

If you make a statement, you need to BACK IT UP. Just as I’ve done.

Doofus.