[Jeff Winston]

Except that we have a Natality Report from 1961 that shows how such births were actually classified. That report uses classifications that are not reflected by the alleged coding manual. That's a problem that YOU cannot get around. You can bleep and blurt all you want about an alleged coding manual, but the report shows that the manual was irrelevant.

No, it is a FACT, JACK, that ALL of the births recorded in the same year were recorded using the SAME SPECIFICATIONS.

You or anyone else can LOOK IT UP.

And you keep making this assertion. I've asked you to prove it.

You don't. You keep asserting it as a fact, without any proof or evidence whatsoever.

IF YOU HAVE THIS SUPPOSED NATALITY REPORT, THEN PRODUCE IT.

Otherwise, it's just more BS from another stupid birther.

[edge919]

You or anyone else can LOOK IT UP.

I did look it up. That's why I said the alleged manual does NOT jibe with the Natality Report. This is a problem for you and every other fogger.