Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amnesty Will Destroy America
The Market-ticker ^ | June 18, 2013 | Karl Denninger

Posted on 06/18/2013 10:08:43 AM PDT by SatinDoll

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: SatinDoll
His purpose: to declare martial law and establish himself as dictator.

I suspect it hasn’t occurred to him that if he is successful - and by no means do I believe it inevitable - it will be his last act as President.

Beyond all of the word games that those inside (and outside) the Beltway play, it's well understood by both sides that a true dictatorship and full "transformation" of America cannot happen while 100 million of the citizens are armed.

Not. Going. To. Happen.

A declaration of martial law would absolutely trigger a violent response from the people - unless, they're disarmed first, which is no doubt part of the Marxist's long range plan. Trying it now, would only result in the widespread arrest and imprisonment of most government officials and employees, and a wholesale reset of our constitutional form of government.

21 posted on 06/18/2013 4:53:18 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I didn’t see anyone react in Boston. Did you?

Everyone, in fact, seemed very cooperative.


22 posted on 06/18/2013 5:50:57 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
That means assimilating into America -- becoming Americans. It means an end to groups like "La Raza." If you wish to be an American there is no hyphenation in your identity and there is no subgroup to which you belong

I agree with some/most of what Denniger says but this will never happen. I'm sorry but there are just too many whites who buy into the 'race is just a skin color' mantra. While some small segment of a racial and/or cultural population will 'assimilate'(whatever that even means), most will not. A super majority will never give up LaRaza or the NAACP, MEChA or any of the other multitude of thousands of race based groups that exist within our supposed colorblind society. The whole thing and idea is a sham and a lie.

23 posted on 06/18/2013 6:13:56 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
I didn’t see anyone react in Boston. Did you? Everyone, in fact, seemed very cooperative.

Oh, you mean when Zero declared martial law there, and his goons went around confiscating weapons and rounding up Tea Party patriots? That time?

A little sarcasm there to illustrate my point, which is, the manhunt for the Boston Marathon bombers was an entirely different type of situation than a declaration of martial law scenario. The public were cooperative because they and the cops were on the same side in that thing. Everyone wanted the bombers captured.

24 posted on 06/18/2013 6:38:36 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Have the remaining “bombers” been charged with any crimes?


25 posted on 06/18/2013 7:24:51 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

You’re talking to the wrong person.

I’m Welsh, Irish, Scottish, English, French, Dutch, Sub-Saharan African, Swiss-Italian, and Spanish. My ancestors came here in the mid-1600s and we’ve dealt with the racism and ancient hatreds dragged here, then left for “dead” because building a nation is really hard work without having to live with inherited resentment.

If there are super majorities who love LaRaza, MECHhA, and the NAACP, then they ought to emigrate to somewhere else. They will be more comfortable in that other place minus the rest of us. No one is stopping them, they are free to go, except that the “super majority”, as you call them, seem to be happier bitching and complaining than doing something constructive.


26 posted on 06/18/2013 7:42:01 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Have the remaining “bombers” been charged with any crimes?

Where are you taking this? I thought we were talking about Zero declaring martial law.

27 posted on 06/18/2013 9:12:21 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

We are talking about BHO2 declaring martial law. You brought up the “Boston bombers”. What happened in Boston is interesting, and I’ve been following it.


28 posted on 06/18/2013 9:41:56 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
We are talking about BHO2 declaring martial law. You brought up the “Boston bombers”.

No, that was you. You asked why the people of Boston didn't rebel against the paramilitary lockdown of their city after the marathon bombing. Now you're asking where the other bombers went.

That's a whole 'nother subject.

29 posted on 06/19/2013 5:20:36 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

By talking about Boston I tried to show how compliant Americans can be when there is a perceived threat.


30 posted on 06/19/2013 11:19:23 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
By talking about Boston I tried to show how compliant Americans can be when there is a perceived threat.

Understood, but as I said in response to your bringing it up, the situation in Boston can't be compared to a martial law scenario. They're two distinctly different things, and have very different dynamics.

In the Boston scenario, the people and the cops were in accord, as everyone perceived a threat from the bombers and wanted them caught.

In a martial law scenario, it would be federal law enforcement and the military against the people, which would naturally be a completely different juxtaposition of sympathies and enmity.

It would necessarily be 'us against them'. The people wouldn't be so compliant under that circumstance. In fact, they'd be at war with the aggressors.

31 posted on 06/19/2013 9:09:36 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Never mind.


32 posted on 06/20/2013 3:55:56 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson