Stay out of the Syrian Civil War, the rebels are working with Al-Qaeda, I agree.
Sarah would kick Dick Cheney’s butt on this one.
Snowden did what many conservatives begged someone in govt to do. Come out and expose the BS. Then many of those ‘conservatives” screamed he was a traitor.
Guess Romney had a real effect on us. Now we are as trustworthy as he is.
She’s right. The problem is this administration and an out of control Congress.
They think they are the “elite” and our betters, which is why they hate Sarah so much.
yes . . . Yes . . . and YES!
I like her more and more. I’m not 100% on Snowden but put a gun to my head and make me chose, and yeah —I’d prolly have done the same.
And Sarah is right on Syria, too —one angry group of Moon Brayers slaying another, so I call that popcorn time.
Sarah —wholesome and RIGHT.
Can't argue with that.
Snowden is a fly. The maggots’ nest is at the White House. The garbage has been sitting for too long.
The Snowden case is having a very interesting effect —cleaving the left into cynical Leftists, and some really brave Authority Questioners.
And it’s having a similar effect on the right —a LOT of people that I thought I was similar to apparently are just from a weird, authority rah-rah crowd, or folks who reflexively support **ANYTHING** that is paramilitary or has a badge —”load ‘em onto the railcars” set.
Snowden is a filter for GENUINE freedom-lovers on both the left and right, and it has had the odd effect of making me identify more with some people who ordinarily I would have considered as America Haters —but apparently they’re sincere.
Sarah has come around to the correct side of history and is emerging as a true spokeswoman for conservatism. She is voicing my sentiments to a tee.
I agree with her.
I go with Alan Dershowitz opinion voiced on Hannity. Charge him with theft, not espionage, if this can indeed be considered a “civil disobedience” case. Snowden could be convicted on that, besides, he knew he broke the law. If this was truly a case of civil disobedience, he would be willing to do the time for the crime. And if such is the case, he should be then obligated to cooperate fully with a Congressional investigation.
I stand with Sarah. She got it right.
I say she’s correct.
Does this woman need to be a genius to run the United States???
Nope...
Does this woman need to be a foreign policy expert to run the United States???
Nope...
Does this person need to be a Lawyer to run the United States???
Nope...
Does this woman need to be a Constitutional expert to rune the United States???
Not at all...
Does this woman need to be a business person to run the United States???
Of course not...Presidents have thousands of expert advisers to give expert advice...
So what DO we need???
In comments to the Daily Caller, the 2008 candidate for vice president also declined to join many of her fellow Republicans in condemning National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden,
saying the real problem was the governments violation of Americans rights.
A lone wolf...An eagle that soars...Sarah Palin...
Giving out spy secrets on criminal operations of this regime is criminal.
Someone link in the Jeff Head commentary on this.
Every night a debate for the heart and soul of a Conservative Republic Party.
Arguing for elitist weinies that presently control the party would be the eunuch, Karl Rove and arguing for grass roots that presently have no voice would be a woman with balls, Sarah Palin.
Snowden is a traitor if he gave Intel to the Chinese. He is also a patriot if he has been truthful about warrantless invasion of personal correspondence between Americans. Surprisingly the two are not mutually exclusive here. But Sarah is right Snow den is not the issue. If you have a boot on your neck does it really matter if the boot is the left or right one?